Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
search and discovery

Spacecraft Probes the Site of Magnetic Reconnection in Earth's Magnetotail

For the first time--and quite by chance--a spacecraft has directly encountered one of the most important energy conversion mechanisms in the solar system.
October 2001 page 16

Even in its quietest moments, the Sun spews forth a hot high-speed wind of ions and electrons. Fortunately for earthly life, the solar wind is diverted around Earth by the planet's magnetic field, which forces the particles to travel along, not across, the field lines. But some charged particles, and the energy they carry, do penetrate Earth's magnetosphere, as the magnetically shielded cavity is known. Magnetic storms that knock out satellites and power grids, the spectacular auroras, the Van Allen belts are all fed and fueled by the solar wind. How are Earth's magnetic defenses breached?

Figure 1
In 1961, James Dungey proposed that the answer lies in magnetic reconnection, an idea that Ronald Giovanelli conceived in 1946 to explain solar flaring. When more or less oppositely pointing field lines approach each other, they can abruptly short-circuit or "reconnect," as shown in figure 1. In the new reconnected configuration, the field lines are bent tightly like the elastic strings of a catapult. When the field lines suddenly straighten, they fling out plasma in opposite directions.

Figure 2
The Sun's magnetic field reverses its overall polarity every 11 years, but the solar wind seethes with a variety of transient structures that change the field's local direction at Earth on much shorter time scales. Where Earth's more stable field abuts the solar field, the conditions for reconnection arise in two zones: at the magnetopause, the Sunward-facing nose of the magnetosphere, and in the magnetotail, its stretched out nightside tail (see figure 2).

Evidence for Dungey's idea has been building steadily. In 1979, the two ISEE spacecraft observed the most dramatic manifestation of reconnection, fast plasma jets, at the magnetopause.1 And in 1998, the GEOTAIL and Equator-S spacecraft teamed up to catch both jets of the same reconnection event, also at the magnetopause.2 But until now, no spacecraft had actually encountered the zone where reconnection occurs. That's not surprising. Reconnection takes place at an unpredictable rate in small regions whose location from Earth is also unpredictable.

On 1 April 1999, NASA's WIND spacecraft was traveling down the magnetotail on its way to an orbit-changing lunar flyby. Just before 8 am GMT, it flew through a reconnection event. Marit Øieroset (University of California, Berkeley) didn't discover this serendipitous prize until she routinely analyzed the day's data five months later. When she did so, she and her colleagues found3 not only the telltale oppositely directed plasma flows of reconnection, but also distinctive magnetic and particle signatures. Although the WIND results don't directly constrain models of jet acceleration, they do provide an unprecedented snapshot of the conditions that lead to reconnection.

X marks the spot

The tenuous plasmas of the magnetosphere are difficult to observe. Unlike the Sun's corona, they don't glow, so measurements have to be made in place. And to get a three-dimensional picture, you need multiple spacecraft. Worse, the plasmas and fields vary over huge spatial and temporal ranges. Of necessity, reconnection mechanisms have been studied more through theory and modeling than through observation.

Before reconnection can occur, the electrons and ions must demagnetize--that is, break away from their original field lines. How they achieve this feat is a key, and still open, question.

Interparticle collisions clearly can't do the job because they're too infrequent in the thin hot plasmas of the magnetosphere. Instead, theorists believe, particle inertia has to play a role. Particles could become scattered through the interaction with wave fields, a mechanism often referred to as anomalous resistivity. Alternatively, recent theoretical and numerical investigations suggest that particles demagnetize by virtue of their orbital motion in regions of low magnetic field or strong gradients.

Figure 3
The WIND data favor the second mechanism and confirm a picture of magnetospheric reconnection first sketched out in 1979 by Bengt Sonnerup of Dartmouth College.4 According to this picture, reconnection begins when the solar wind squeezes a part of the magnetotail from above and below the so-called X-line, the notional locus of a reconnection event (see figure 3). Magnetically entrained particles can't be compressed indefinitely. They resist when the region they occupy is about the same size as their radius of gyration about the field lines.

First to push back and demagnetize are the positively charged ions (mostly protons), whose gyroradius in the magnetotail is about 700 km. The electrons, meanwhile, continue inward, moving past the more or less stationary ions until they reach their much smaller gyroradius of about 20 km. It is in this small region, known as the electron diffusion region, that the electrons demagnetize and set off reconnection.

The drift of electrons relative to the ions creates a system of currents and magnetic fields akin to the classical Hall effect (see figure 3). Characteristically, the Hall fields are directed across, not along, the magnetotail and can exist well above the midplane of the magnetotail. In its chance encounter with the 1 April 1999 reconnection event, WIND detected both the Hall current and magnetic field. GEOTAIL, too, has observed Hall signatures,5 which would not be seen if reconnection were mediated by anomalous resistivity.

Paradoxically, although WIND missed the electron diffusion region, the spacecraft's chance encounter underscores the importance of probing the region where electrons demagnetize. Pulling the electrons off their field lines requires an electric field, but reconnection, at least at the X-line, implies zero magnetic field and, with it, the possibility that electrons could short-circuit the electric field. Some kind of plasma instability might maintain the electric field, but simulations show that electrons tend to be kicked away from the X-line by the Lorentz force, so an instability might not be needed.

Observing the electron diffusion region is one of the goals of NASA's Magnetospheric Multiscale mission (MMS). Scheduled for launch in 2006, MMS consists of four identical spacecraft that will fly in a tetrahedral formation with a minimum separation of 10 km--fine enough, space physicists hope, to measure what they call the microphysics of reconnection in three dimensions. Meanwhile, another formation flyer, the European Space Agency's Cluster 2 mission, has been gleaning data in the magnetosphere since its launch last year.

WIND, however, might not witness another reconnection event. To save money, NASA plans to mothball the seven-year-old spacecraft.

Charles Day

References

    1. G. Paschmann et al., Nature 282, 243 (1979).
    2. T. D. Phan et al., Nature 404, 848 (2000).
    3. M. Øieroset, T. D. Phan, M. Fujimoto, R. P. Lin, R. P. Lepping, Nature 412, 414 (2001).
    4. B. U. Ö. Sonnerup, in Solar System Plasma Physics, vol. III, L. T. Lanzerotti, C. F. Kennel, E. N. Parker, eds., North-Holland, New York (1979), p.45.
    5. T. Nagai et al., J. Geophys. Res. (in press).
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Physics and Archaeology
  • The Little Machines That are Making it Big
  • Physicist Arrested in Iran
  • After-Dinner Physics
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed