|
Articles
Superfluid Helium Droplets: An Ultracold Nanolaboratory
The unique environment in liquid helium droplets opens up new opportunities for molecular spectroscopy and for probing superfluid phenomena on the atomic scale.
Compared to the extensive experimental and theoretical studies of macroscopic superfluid phenomena, experimental studies of the microscopic details have been sparse because of the lack of adequate probes. A major problem has been that liquid He has a natural ability to cleanse itself of impurities, which either aggregate in the bulk or condense on surfaces. In recent years, techniques have been developed1 to laser ablate materials inside liquid or solid He. These experiments have been limited so far to metal atoms or ions, both of which interact strongly with the He environment following electronic excitation. These interactions lead to large line shifts and to broad features in the excitation spectrum of the embedded materials. It turns out, however, that nanoscopic droplets of He can readily be doped with various molecules--a technique that provides a powerful spectroscopic probe of the molecules and of the droplets themselves.
The very narrow spectral features render these molecular probes an ideal tool to address a number of longstanding, intriguing questions. How is it possible to detect superfluidity in droplets? What does it even mean for a droplet to be superfluid, when most of the known characteristic phenomena are macroscopic and not obviously applicable to nanoscale droplets? How many atoms are needed for a fluid to become a superfluid? Can molecule-sized objects move without friction inside a superfluid?
Spectroscopic evidence for superfluidity
A typical apparatus for detecting spectroscopic transitions of embedded molecules is illustrated in Figure 1. This technique uses the so-called depletion method, in which photon absorption in the doped droplets leads to the evaporation of atoms from the droplet and a consequent decrease in the signal from a mass spectrometer monitoring the droplet beam. The depletion method is especially sensitive for He droplets because of their very low heat of vaporization (7.2 K per atom for 4He, 2.7 K per atom for 3He). This simple apparatus, together with modifications in different research groups, has proven to be quite universal for spectroscopic investigations of a wide range of substances.2
Rotations of molecules in helium droplets
More than 14 different molecular species, with various geometries, have now been studied, mostly in Göttingen, in Princeton, or in Roger Miller's group at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. In all cases, sharp rotational lines are found. The increase in the effective moment of inertia varies, however, from factors of about 3-5 for heavy or extended molecules, such as SF6 and substituted acetylenic derivatives, to zero increase for H2O, HF, and other small, light molecules.2 A microscopic rotating bucket
This experiment also yields insight into the size dependence of superfluid behavior in 4He clusters. Passing 3He droplets containing a single OCS molecule through a second scattering chamber filled to different pressures with 4He gas allowed a variable number of 4He atoms to be added to each droplet. These 4He atoms diffused inside the 3He liquid droplet, where, because of their heavier mass and hence lower zero-point energy and stronger binding, they replaced the 3He atoms adjacent to the OCS molecule. Figures 4c to 4f show how the measured spectra change with increasing numbers of added 4He atoms. Rotational lines begin to reappear with about 35 4He atoms, and are well established after the addition of about 60 4He atoms. The density of He atoms immediately around the molecule is highly modulated, characterized by a first, highly structured layer containing about 17 atoms and having peak density considerably higher than the bulk, surrounded by a second, more weakly modulated layer.6 These layered structures, known as quantum solvation shells, result from the interplay between the molecule-He and He-He interactions.7 The approximately 60 4He atoms that suffice to restore the conditions for free rotation in the mixed droplets constitute about two solvation shells. Recent density functional calculations by Manuel Barranco and his colleagues at the University of Barcelona for such mixed droplets indicate that about 30% of the outermost of the two 4He solvation layers may actually be composed of 3He. The extent to which the 3He atoms influence the superfluidity near the molecule is unclear at present. These experiments illustrate some of the new opportunities for studying phase transitions in finite-sized quantum systems, and other phenomena, by using mixed droplets to modify either the environment of the molecule or the droplet temperature. At 0.15 K, the droplets are at temperatures that are otherwise only accessible inside unwieldy and expensive dilution refrigerator cryostats. Theoretical understanding
Experimental investigations of He droplets have been accompanied by theoretical insights from a range of simple models and from microscopic calculations.7 Early variational calculations by Vijay Pandharipande and colleagues at the University of Illinois showed that significant Bose-Einstein condensate fractions exist inside small 4He clusters. In analogy to Andronikashvili's rotating bucket experiment (see box 2), Philippe Sindzingre and Michael Klein at the University of Pennsylvania, together with David Ceperley at the University of Illinois, calculated the quantum response of a liquid droplet undergoing hypothetical rotation, to obtain a direct measure of the normal fluid fraction. For clusters as small as 64 atoms, substantial superfluid fractions were found to arise below a broadened, size-dependent transition temperature that is somewhat depressed below the bulk superfluid transition at 2.17 K. Mushti Rama Krishna, then at Berkeley, and one of us (Whaley) calculated the collective excitation spectrum in 4He clusters and found that the roton excitations characteristic of the bulk superfluid state already appear at about 70 atoms. Calculations for doped clusters predict that strongly bound atoms and molecules are located in the interior, while very weakly bound species may be located at the droplet surface. Other properties of He droplets, such as their very low temperatures resulting from evaporative cooling, have been explored by Sandro Stringari and colleagues at the University of Trento, using the liquid drop model from nuclear physics. These studies imply that the interior of the droplets, where the embedded molecules are located, are expected to be largely devoid of thermal excitations at these low temperatures. Over the past two years, several theoretical groups have investigated the phenomenon of molecular rotations in He droplets.6 The Princeton group has advocated the use of hydrodynamics to describe the superfluid response to molecular rotation, and Carlo Callegari and Kevin Lehmann at Princeton have obtained agreement with measured molecular moments of inertia for some linear polyatomic molecules. In contrast, Vladimir Babichenko and Yuri Kagan at the Kurchatov Institute in Moscow have pointed out that the difference between the line widths in the molecular spectra found in pure 4He and 3He droplets (compare panels a and b in Figure 4) can be explained in terms of the different elementary excitations in these two quantum fluids (see box 2), and argued that the hydrodynamic manifestations of superfluidity are not relevant on this molecular length scale.
A critical concept emerging from these quantum calculations is that of "adiabatic following," the notion that some of the He density in the first solvation shell may adiabatically follow the molecular rotation. Detailed quantum Monte Carlo analysis of this phenomenon shows that, for heavier molecules, a fraction of the density in the first solvation shell can indeed follow the molecular rotation adiabatically, while for lighter molecules such as HCN, the extent of adiabatic following is very much reduced.6 The ultimate spectroscopic matrix
The unusually small line shifts and the narrow spectral lines demonstrate that these He droplets are the gentlest and coldest of all matrices used for molecular spectroscopy. Up to now, about 50 different molecules have been studied in the infrared, visible, or near ultraviolet,2 including amino acids and porphyrin derivatives, which play important roles in many biological processes.
There is now evidence that weakly bound van der Waals and hydrogen-bonded complexes may self-assemble inside He droplets to different structures than those produced in seeded beams. This has been vividly demonstrated recently by Klaas Nauta and Miller.12 Free HCN clusters containing four or more HCN molecules show nonpolar, cyclic structures. In He droplets, however, predominantly linear chains of up to eight HCN molecules are found; the chain length seems to be limited only by the radius of the droplet. This abundance of chains is attributed to the very low temperatures, which enable the long-range dipole forces to line the molecules up over large distances. These results suggest strategies for growing nanoscale oligomers with novel structures. In addition, chemical reactions at ultralow temperatures may be studied in He droplets, as recently demonstrated13 with the bimolecular reaction Ba + N2O → BaO + N2. The unusual features associated with solvation in He droplets may provide interesting new opportunities for control of reaction pathways. The future
Given that the first spectroscopic evidence for sharp spectral lines was found only in 1994, the progress since has been quite impressive. A significant recent technical advance is the use of double resonance techniques by the groups at Princeton, Göttingen, and the University of Bochum in Germany led by Martina Havenith, which reveal additional fine structure in the spectra having only 100 MHz spacings.14 The next generation of experiments is now poised to explore more subtle issues, such as the effect of the finite size of the droplets on spectroscopic features. Of particular interest is the interplay between confinement and superfluid solvation. Several groups have addressed the intrinsic delocalization of embedded molecules in quantum droplets with microscopic calculations or particle-in-a-box models.7 Lehmann has predicted that the confining surface provides both symmetry breaking, which can introduce a splitting of spectral lines, and a potential source of line broadening.15 Some evidence for frictionless, delocalized motion within 4He droplets has already been obtained in recent studies of electron bubble lifetimes performed in Göttingen.16 The rich multiplicity of phenomena associated with the bulk superfluid state of He suggests a number of additional topics in which these spectroscopic probes can offer new, microscopic insight into the local superfluid dynamics. Vortices, while energetically unfavorable in finite clusters, can potentially be stabilized by long, chainlike molecules. They should give rise to additional dynamical modes of the molecule, while the associated spectral features may reveal details of the He flow on a molecular length scale. Large planar organic molecules offer the possibility of studying the solvation behavior of the superfluid state on a "nanosubstrate," whose size and symmetry may be systematically varied. This would allow probing the transition from superfluid liquid to a localized adsorbed layer. Combining doped He nanodroplets with molecular spectroscopy, therefore, allows the vast gap between isolated atomic impurities and miniature solid surfaces to be probed, opening up for the first time the microscopic behavior of liquid He and its interfacial dynamics over many length scales. Complementary to the next generation of cluster experiments, it is now imperative to revisit the significant experimental challenge of introducing single molecules into the bulk liquid. This could open up novel opportunities for using liquid He as a special medium for assembling or manipulating molecules, using laser tweezers or three-dimensional scanning microscope probes for example, while simultaneously monitoring what is going on with high-resolution spectroscopy. The cluster spectroscopy experiments to date have demonstrated the capability of molecular dopants to probe quantum liquid phenomena. We can expect many more exciting and rewarding results in the future. 1. For a review, see B. Tabbert, H. Günther, G. zu Putlitz, J. Low Temp. Phys. 109, 653 (1997).
2. For a recent review of spectroscopic measurements, see J. P. Toennies, A. F. Vilesov, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 49, 1 (1998).
3. See S. Grebenev et al., Physica B 280, 65 (2000) and references therein.
4. M. Hartmann et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1566 (1995).
5. S. Grebenev, J. P. Toennies, A. F. Vilesov, Science 279, 2083 (1998).
6. See Y. Kwon et al., J. Chem. Phys. 113, 6469 (2000), and references therein.
7. For a review of theoretical work on pure and doped He clusters before 1998, and for references to work described here, see K. B. Whaley, in Advances in Molecular Vibrations and Collision Dynamics, vol. 3, J. Bowman, ed., JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn. (1998).
8. For a review of modern computational path integral methodology and applications to He systems, see D. M. Ceperley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 279 (1995).
9. R. P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 90, 1116 (1953); 91, 1261 (1953).
10. See J. Higgins et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 102, 4952 (1998), and references therein.
11. F. Federmann et al., Eur. Phys. J. D 9, 1 (1999).
12. K. Nauta, R. E. Miller, Science 283, 1895 (1999); 287, 293 (2000).
13. E. Lugovoi, J. P. Toennies, A. F. Vilesov, J. Chem. Phys. 112, 8217 (2000).
14. I. Reinhard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 5036 (1999). S. Grebenev et al., J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9060 (2000).
15. K. K. Lehmann, Mol. Phys. 97, 639 (1999).
16. M. Farnik et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3892 (1998).
17. D. R. Miller, in Atomic and Molecular Beam Methods, vol. 1, G. Scoles, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, (1988).
18. L. D. Landau, J. Phys. USSR 5, 71 (1941); 11, 91 (1947).
Peter Toennies (jtoenni@gwdg.de) is emeritus director at the Max Planck Institute for Fluid Dynamics in Göttingen, Germany, a professor of physics at the University of Göttingen, and an adjunct professor of physics at the University of Bonn. Andrej Vilesov (vilesov@chem1.usc.edu) is an associate professor of chemistry at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles. Birgitta Whaley (whaley@socrates.berkeley.edu) is a professor of chemistry at the University of California, Berkeley.
|
|
|







This Publication
Scitation
SPIN
Scitopia
Google Scholar
PubMed