Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
letters

Insect Flight Simulation Resembles Navier-Stokes

June 2001 page 82

We read with interest the article on the most recent accomplishments in insect hovering research (Physics Today, December 2000, page 22. We would like to draw attention to work published a decade earlier,1,2 which seems to have been missed by the author, that expressly resorted to the same two-dimensional simplifications to investigate and explain the essence of insect flight.

Over a decade ago, the complexities of insect flight so apparent in the seminal paper by Christopher Somps and Marvin Luttges3 inspired us to design an experimental apparatus. It allowed us to study 2D vortex shedding and thrust generation by an airfoil undergoing translation and pitching that resembled insect wing motions during hovering flight.1 Almost concurrently with the experimental work, we realized that the hovering jet generated by the physical model was amenable to computational Navier-Stokes simulations.2 The numerical simulations gave good agreement with measured results.

References
1. P. Freymuth, Exper. Fluids 9, 17 (1990).
2. K. Gustafson, R. Leben, J. McArthur, Comput. Fluid Dynamics J. 1 (1) 47 (1992).
3. C. Somps, M. Luttges, Science 228, 1326 (1985).

Peter Freymuth
(peter.freymuth@colorado.edu)

Karl Gustafson
(karl.gustafson@colorado.edu)

Robert Leben
(robert.leben@colorado.edu)
University of Colorado, Boulder
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • The Physics of Earthquakes
  • The Early Days of Pugwash
  • Warming Oceans Appear Linked to Increasing Atmospheric Greenhouse Gases
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed