Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
search and discovery

B-Decay Experiments Show Clear Violation of CP Symmetry

September 2001 page 19

In March, back-to-back papers in Physical Review Letters reported the measurement of CP symmetry violation in the decay of neutral B mesons by groups in Japan and California.1,2 (See Physics Today, May 2001, page 17*.) Now the word "measurement" has been replaced by "observation" in the titles of two new back-to-back reports3,4 by these same groups in the 27 August Physical Review Letters. That is to say, with a lot more data and improved event reconstruction, the BaBar collaboration at SLAC and the Belle collaboration at KEK in Japan have at last produced the first compelling evidence of CP violation in any system other than the neutral K mesons.

The evidence for CP violation in the BaBar and Belle experiments is summarized by a nonvanishing value for the measured parameter sin 2β. In March, each collaboration reported that its measured sin 2β was about 1.7 standard deviations above zero. That was encouraging, but not yet convincing.

Now that each experiment has created more than 30 million BB̄ pairs in its asymmetric electron-positron collider, the evidence for CP violation in B decays is quite compelling. BaBar reports a sin 2β of 0.59 ± 0.15, four standard deviations from zero. With essentially the same quoted uncertainty, Belle reports an even larger CP violation, namely sin 2β = 0.99.

If one combines the two results without worrying about the marginally uncomfortable discrepancy between them, one gets a world average of 0.79 ± 0.1. That's in good agreement with the sin 2β = 0.7 ± 0.2 predicted without much precision by the standard model of particle theory. As the experimental errors continue to shrink with the accumulation of data over the next few years, so will the uncertainty of the theoretical prediction, which actually depends on ongoing worldwide measurements of related but less exotic processes.

So now, 37 years after the unanticipated discovery of a small amplitude for CP violation in neutral-kaon decay, we have at last a second arena in which to study this important phenomenon. But the very attribute that suits neutral B mesons so well to this study--namely, the almost maximal value of sin 2β--is not an unmixed blessing. A phenomenon so generously favored by the standard model makes it difficult to glimpse any small nonstandard mechanism that might guide us toward a more encompassing theory. Therefore Belle and BaBar are also seeking to measure smaller CP-violating parameters related to rare B decay modes, in an effort to find small departures from standard-model predictions.

Bertram Schwarzschild

References
1. A. Abashian et al. (Belle collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2509 (2001).
2. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2515 (2001).
3. B. Aubert et al. (BaBar collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 091801 (2001).
4. K. Abe et al. (Belle collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 091802 (2001).

Physics Today Reference
May 2001, page 17
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Communication in a Disordered World
  • Two Revolutions in K-8 Science Education
  • Element 118 Bows Out
  • Russia Banks on Importing Nuclear Waste
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed