Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
letters

Another Fermi Tale

March 2003 page 13

During a lecture at Los Alamos around 1945, Enrico Fermi was at the chalkboard discussing how a dependent variable--it may have been a cross section--varied with the independent variable, which may have been energy. Initially, the independent variable rose steeply, but when a criterion was satisfied, the steep rise ceased and the dependent variable thereafter remained approximately constant. To show this graphically, Fermi drew an x-axis and a y-axis on the chalkboard. He then drew the curve, which initially rose steeply and then leveled off.

Thus far, Fermi had drawn three lines to illustrate his point and had given them no markings of anything quantitative. He then stepped back from the board, thought for a moment, took a six-inch slide rule from his shirt pocket, and did a quick calculation. The result of the calculation prompted him to say that the level part of the curve was not as high as he had drawn it. Going back to the board, he used his fingers to erase the horizontal part of the curve and then carefully redrew it an inch or two lower than it had been initially. The room was silent for a moment, and then laughter erupted. Fermi smiled and continued the lecture.

Albert A. Bartlett
(albert.bartlett@colorado.edu)
University of Colorado
Boulder
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix
  • L'Oréal and UNESCO Award Women Physicists $500 000
  • Integrity in Industrial Research
  • Will Tenure Survive as Money Shrinks and Adjunct Faculty Ranks Swell?
  • Hydrogen: The Essential Element
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed