Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
issues and events

Yucca Mountain Workers Exposed to Dangerous Dust

May 2004, page 30

Digging techniques designed to protect the "scientific integrity" of a test tunnel at the US Department of Energy's Yucca Mountain project exposed more than a thousand workers to dangerous silica dust between 1992 and 1996, according to a DOE safety official. As many as 1500 workers may have been exposed to the dust, which can cause silicosis, a progressive and potentially fatal lung disease.

Yucca Mountain
The problem first came to light last September when a former worker at Yucca Mountain told DOE's Office of the Inspector General that workers had been overexposed to silica dust during mining operations in the early to mid−1990s. An investigation found that for several years after digging began on the five−mile−long test tunnel, water suppression of dust was not routinely used. According to Gene Runkle, a safety official with DOE's Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management (OCRWM), "to ensure scientific integrity of the tests that would be performed there," the suppression technique was not used.

Moisture is a critical issue in Yucca Mountain, which is slated to become the federal government's permanent repository for tens of thousands of tons of high−level radioactive nuclear waste. Pending approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission—DOE plans to submit its license application in December—Yucca Mountain could begin to receive waste in 2010. Standards call for the waste to be isolated from the surrounding environment for at least 10 000 years—and that requires, among other things, an extremely dry facility.

Former employees have also claimed, and DOE officials have conceded, that tunnel workers weren't required by the DOE mining contractor to wear respirators or even facemasks during the first several years of tunneling. After a 1996 safety review by OCRWM, respirators were made mandatory and ventilation was significantly improved in the tunnel, according to testimony Runkle gave at a recent hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development held in Las Vegas, Nevada. Runkle also said that a protection program established in 1998 has actively monitored workers and discovered only two confirmed cases of silicosis.

Gene Griego, the former tunnel worker who first alerted DOE to the problem, contends that there are scores of people affected by silicosis. He has filed a class−action lawsuit against the DOE contractors who oversaw the early tunneling.

DOE officials responded in January to complaints about the silica overexposure by setting up a medical screening program, which is run by the University of Cincinnati under the direction of OCRWM. Letters have been mailed to about 2400 current and former employees informing them of the program. Yucca Mountain workers who might have been exposed to high levels of silica dust and other potentially toxic materials are offered free silicosis screening. As of late March, 300 people had responded to the letter.

Senator Harry Reid (D−NV), a staunch opponent of the Yucca Mountain project since its inception in 1987, is highly critical of DOE's handling of the silicosis issue. In announcing the Senate hearing in Las Vegas, Reid said DOE "sent workers into that mountain knowing full well of the presence of silica and knowing full well that exposure to silica can cause death." He added that DOE knew the exposure was "100% preventable, but did nothing that would have protected these workers. At best, DOE's actions are negligent and at worst criminal, and I intend to use this hearing to get to the bottom of this." Reid is particularly passionate about the issue because, according to his staff, his father was a miner who suffered from silicosis.

At one point during the hearing, Reid interrupted Runkle and said, "DOE ignored the threat. What has taken place here is just absolutely wrong."

Runkle later said project administrators were trying to "balance operations and the safety requirements at the time. There were safety processes in place and they were taken into
account."

Reid has promised the former workers that his office will closely monitor the safety and screening programs at the mountain. Meanwhile, a DOE staff member said, a departmental investigation is under way into allegations that air monitoring numbers were altered by project managers in the mid−1990s to cover up the extent of the dust problem.

Jim Dawson

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Could Feynman have said this?
  • Conflicting Results on a Long-Lived Nuclear Isomer of Hafnium Have Wider Implications
  • US Government Backs Off From Imposing Restrictions on Publishers
  • Marburger Refutes Claims That Bush Administration Misuses Science
  • Yucca Mountain Workers Exposed to Dangerous Dust
  • The Big Splat, or How Our Moon Came to Be, D. Mackenzie (reviewed by E. Asphaug)
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011

 

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed