Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs

Letters

Foundational Work in Fermionic Condensates

August 2004, page 23

The March 2004 issue of Physics Today (page 21) gave a nice description of the recent results by Cindy Regal, Markus Greiner, and Deborah Jin on the observation of Bose−Einstein condensation of paired fermionic atoms in the interesting strongly interacting regime. Unfortunately, the article failed to mention the seminal theoretical work of Murray Holland and coworkers1 that inspired the experiment discussed. Holland's work demonstrated that one could get strong coupling in a cold fermionic gas near a Feshbach resonance, and hence BEC at very high temperatures, just as was observed. Eddy Timmermans and coworkers published similar ideas at about the same time.2

Incidentally, Tin-Lun Ho's comment to Physical Review Letters, in which he disputed the reported interpretation, was withdrawn.

References

1. M. Holland et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 120406 (2001) [MEDLINE].
2. E. Timmermans et al., Phys. Lett. A 285, 228 (2001) [INSPEC].

Carl Wieman
University of Colorado, Boulder

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Satellite-Observed Changes in the Arctic
  • Edward Teller in the Public Arena
  • ITER Impasse Illustrates Challenge of Site Selection
  • Light and Color for Minority Middle Schoolers
  • New Books
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011

 

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed