Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
Letters

Illumination on Noctilucent Clouds

March 2005, page 17

The article "Dusty Plasmas in the Laboratory, Industry, and Space," by Robert Merlino and John Goree (Physics Today, July 2004, page 32) was interesting, informative, and well written. However, allow me to correct three statements. Although they are admittedly not central to the point of the article, it would be a shame to misinform readers with outdated information.

Recent results by Michael Gadsden1 and by Sheila Kirkwood and Kerstin Stebel2 show that the apparent increase in the observed frequency of noctilucent clouds over the past 30 years does not hold up to rigorous reanalysis of the observations. I concede that the belief in the increased frequency was widespread until August 2002, but it is wrong. The occurrence of these clouds does exhibit an apparent anticorrelation with the solar cycle, but their minimum occurs before the sunspot maximum. Whether the correlation is real or coincidental is still under study. There is no linear trend in the occurrence of noctilucent clouds.

Among hundreds of published temperature measurements taken near the high-latitude mesopause in summer, only one has been as cold as 100 K. To my knowledge, even the author who published that measurement no longer quotes it. Consensus among scientists working in the field is that noctilucent clouds occur when the temperature at an altitude between 80 and 88 km drops below 150 K, which occurs often at high latitudes in summer. The average mesopause temperature at high latitudes is near 128 K. Even that value is rather sensational, the coldest temperature on or near Earth.

It is completely new that water vapor released at high altitudes tends to collect near the poles, and such a statement should not be published without proof or reference. The global circulation in the summer stratosphere and mesosphere is upward and slightly poleward.3 The large-scale, long-term average upward motion is a consequence of acceleration by breaking buoyancy waves. Through adiabatic cooling, the updraft leads to the cold temperatures that create the noctilucent clouds. The water vapor content in the mesosphere is difficult to measure, but appears to be near 5 parts per million by volume in summer at high latitudes.4 The source of the vapor is still under study. Michael H. Stevens and coauthors have published one slightly elevated water vapor observation in the high- latitude mesosphere,5 which may be a plume from a space shuttle launch. It is unlikely that any significant portion of observed noctilucent clouds should be due to shuttle launches, as those clouds have been observed since 1884.

References

1. M. Gadsden, "Statistics of the Annual Counts of Nights on Which NLCs Were Seen," Paper given at the Mesospheric Clouds 2002 meeting in Perth, Scotland, 19-22 August 2002, Memoirs British Astron. Assoc. , vol. 45, Aurora Section.
2. S. Kirkwood, K. Stebel, J. Geophys. Res. 108, 8440 (2003) [SPIN].
3. World Meteorological Organisation, Atmospheric Ozone 1985, WMO Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project rep. no. 16, WMO, Geneva, Switzerland (1985).
4. C. Seele, P. Hartogh, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 1517 (1999) [SPIN].
5. M. H. Stevens, J. Gumbel, C. R. Englert, K. U. Grossmann, M. Rapp, P. Hartogh, Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1546 (2003) [SPIN].


Ulf-Peter Hoppe
(ulf-peter.hoppe@ffi.no)
Norwegian Defence Research
Establishment (FFI)
Kjeller, Norway
  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Entrepreneur Launches Low-Cost Space Rockets
  • A Nontrivial Manifesto
  • New Books
  • Letters
  •  
  • Related links
  • Dusty Plasmas in the Laboratory, Industry, and Space

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed