Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
Letters

Note on a Rosalind Franklin Note

March 2006, page 14

In the caption to Figure 4d of my PHYSICS TODAY article about Rosalind Franklin (March 2003, page 42), I had interpreted Franklin's writing "i.e. chains are in pairs, one upside-down wrt the other" as meaning that she had "determined that the backbone chains of A-form DNA are antiparallel." It was recently pointed out to me that the statement could mislead readers into believing that those chains were definitely within one molecule, as opposed to possibly being in adjacent molecules. However, if Franklin had definitely realized that the two chains of the A form were within one molecule, she probably would have had a more obvious eureka moment.

I stand corrected as a result of a mutual acquaintance recently informing me that the expert, Franklin's Birkbeck colleague Aaron Klug, thought my interpretation unjustified. However, the error does not affect my overall conclusion that Franklin was close to solving DNA structure by herself—a conclusion reached independently by both Klug and Crick.

Lynne Osman Elkin
(lynne.elkin@csueastbay.edu)
California State University, East Bay
Hayward

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Time Too Good to Be True
  • Microfluidic Chip Synthesizes Radiolabel for Positron Emission Tomography
  • New Books
  • New Products
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011
  • Related from the archive
  • Rosalind Franklin and the Double Helix

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed