Physics Today
Jump to Content
Increase text size Decrease text size
  • Sign In
  • View Items in Cart View Cart
  • Advanced
  • Keyword
 
  • Home
  • Print Edition
  • Daily Edition
    • News Picks
    • The Dayside
    • Physics Update
    • Singularities
    • Points of View
    • Politics and Policy
    • Science and the Media
    • Obituaries
    • We Hear That
    • Events Calendar
  • Advertising
  • Buyer's Guide
  • About us
    • Our mission
    • Our people
    • American Institute of Physics
    • Member societies
    • Register
    • Subscribe
    • Submit content
    • Marketing reprints
    • Rights and permissions
    • Help/FAQ
    • Change mailing address
    • Contact us
  • Jobs
    • Job Seeker Login
    • Search Jobs
    • Post Resumes
    • Career Resources
    • For Employers
    • Success Stories
    • Resume Templates
    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Display Advertising
    • Employer Resources
    • Banner Advertising
    • Security Tips
Follow us: Facebook    Twitter    rss    E-mail alert
  • Table of contents
  • Past issues

yellow star Featured Jobs

  • Search jobs
  • Post jobs
Letters

One thing Einstein didn't do in 1905

June 2006, page 11

As we look back on 2005, the 100th anniversary of Einstein's most creative year, it is worthwhile to remember what he didn't discover—or at least what he didn't tell us he discovered—in 1905. Among the items is the photon.

A "photon"—the name was coined by the physical chemist Gilbert Lewis in 1926—is an elementary particle with energy hν, momentum hν/c, and mass zero. In 1905, Einstein discussed an energy quantum only. He did not discuss the quantum's momentum until 1916. On the question of the mass, his 1905 paper contains an odd calculation. He noted that the average kinetic energy for a Maxwell–Boltzmann particle in a distribution at a temperature T is given by 3kT/2 (in our present notation, not his). He assumed that the Wien spectrum, which he used for high frequencies to exhibit the entropy of the radiation, is valid for all frequencies. He then calculated, in his notation

Equation

Wilhelm Wien found his distribution using the analogy to the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, although it did not occur to him to ask why that particle analogy might be valid for radiation. The above result is what you would get if you replaced the classical kinetic energy by pc, which would be appropriate for a massless particle. Einstein never explained why he did this calculation or what its significance was.

Jeremy Bernstein
Stevens Institute of Technology
Aspen, Colorado

  • Article Tools
  • Enlarge text   Enlarge text
  • Shrink text   Shrink text
  • Comment on this articleWrite a letter to the editor
  • Free this month
  • Trend-spotting: Physics in 1931 and today
  • Science and government
  • Diversity in physics
  • New Books
  • New Products
  • Letters
  • Most popular articles
  • Gedanken experiment: Levitate a physics sitcom?
    Points of View
  • Nanoplasmonics: The physics behind the applications
    February 2011
  • Half-quantum vortices
    Physics Update
  • Quantum criticality
    February 2011

 



SERVICES
Physics Today Jobs
Physics Today Buyers Guide
Event Calendar
Obituaries
DAILY EDITION
The Dayside
News Picks
Science in the Media
Politics & Policy
Singularities
Physics Update
Points of View
THE MAGAZINE
This month in print
Institutional subscriptions
Information for advertisers
READER SERVICE
Register
Sign in
Subscribe
Email alert
MORE INFO
FAQ
Contact us
About Physics Today
Privacy Policy
Marketing reprints
Rights and Permissions

Copyright © by the American Institute of Physics - All rights reserved

Find articles by AUTHORNAME

This PublicationThis Publication
ScitationScitation
SPINSPIN
ScitopiaScitopia
Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
PubMedPubMed